back to main turd
Why AI Will Never Really Exist...
Mugs are available here: https://www.zazzle.com/ai_and_parrots_mug-256228705403543100
This is so succinct as to all of this:
From the first Jurassic Park Movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oNgyUAEv0Q
"Don't
you see the danger shown inherent in what you're doing here ...
you wield it like a kid that's found his dad's gun. I'll tell you the
problem with the scientific power that you're using here ... it
didn't require any discipline to attain it ...
You
read what others had done and you then you took the next step - -
you didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves so you don't take any
responsibility for it ...
You
stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as
you could and before you even knew you had you you patented it and
packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunch box and now ... you sell
it ...
Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could they didn't stop to think if they should."
Another great quote from the novel later on...
The mugs came about after a few incidents:
- Me actually developing this stuff
I'm
a hardware designer with over 40 years experience and over 3,000
products, including one of the first IoT systems in 1995 (patent here:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6208266 ; story here:
https://www.ajawamnet.com/amnet/ ) Note the 3D printing we were doing
in 1996.
I
currently design a lot of hardware using technology such as NVIDIA's
various "AI" (sic) processors as well as Google's TPU/Coral parts.
These are nothing more than fast math engines with massive amounts of
parallel processing. They allow programmers to use things like
neural networks, and techniques like Backpropagation for
"training" machine learning systems.
That's it. No real intelligence.
I
even got ChatGPT to agree with this - - see later in this rant as well
as the second transcript of that ChatGPT session below where it totally
hoses answers to some questions I present it.
It all began with the Perceptron created by Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts in 1943.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron
" The first hardware implementation was Mark I Perceptron machine built in 1957 at the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory by Frank Rosenblatt,[6] funded by the Information Systems Branch of the United States Office of Naval Research and the Rome Air Development Center."
This
shit started with John McCarthy in 1956 stating the term AI because -
so he thought - "every aspect of learning or any other feature of
intelligence
can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it.”
WRONG!! It died in the early 1980's - maybe because all the ex-hippies realized it was bullshit.
It's not just me. See these articles:
Model autophagy disorder: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01850
https://jensorensen.com/2024/09/11/ai-model-collapse-mad-cow-cartoon/
More here - Rice University - Breaking MAD: Generative AI could break the internet: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/07/240730134759.htm
A great article here titled "Generative AI, Bullshit as a Service"
https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/generative-ai-bullshit-as-a-service
and this:
Press Pause on the Silicon Valley Hype Machine
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/15/opinion/artificial-intelligence-ai-openai-chatgpt-overrated-hype.html
Then there's this:
Wall Street Asks If AI's Juice Is Worth The Squeeze
Analysts and one very prominent AI academic think the bubble is about to burst.
https://www.inc.com/sam-blum/wall-street-asks-if-ais-juice-is-worth-the-squeeze.html
and this:
Has the AI bubble burst? Wall Street wonders if artificial intelligence will ever make money
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/02/tech/wall-street-asks-big-tech-will-ai-ever-make-money/index.html
As I quote below, Professor Matthew Jones of Princeton calls it a "...rebranding of Linear Algebra and Machine Learning"...
And ML is FAR from intelligence.
Shit we have even less REAL intelligence now. Ask someone to manually divide two numbers. Nope... can't do it.
We're heading for another AI winter... just like it's always been.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter
"In the history of artificial intelligence, an AI winter is a period of reduced funding and interest in artificial intelligence research.[1] The field has experienced several hype cycles, followed by disappointment and criticism, followed by funding cuts, followed by renewed interest years or even decades later."
Are we at another "AI Winter"?
Well, see this article in the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/15/opinion/artificial-intelligence-ai-openai-chatgpt-overrated-hype.html
where it mentions, "In
my eyes, it’s looking less like an all-powerful being and more like a
bad intern whose work is so unreliable that it’s often easier to do the
task yourself."
Also note in that NYT article:
-
an actual human developer took on AI's code bot "Devin" and was
able to do in 36 minutes what took Devin six hours to do. “Right
now the state of the art of generative A.I. is it just does a bad,
complicated, convoluted job that just makes more work for everyone
else,” Mr. Brown concluded in his YouTube video.
- Molly White mentions, "I
find my feelings about A.I. are actually pretty similar to my feelings
about blockchains: They do a poor job of much of what people try to do
with them, they can’t do the things their creators claim they one day
might, and many of the things they are well suited to do may not be
altogether that beneficial."
- even though it was stated that ChatGPT-4 aced the bar exam, it actually scored in the 48th percentile - not 99th.
-
Google's claim that AI created all these new amazing chemical compounds
was debunked by materials chemists at UofC Santa Barbara where, “scant evidence for compounds that fulfill the trifecta of novelty, credibility and utility.”
For more on this AI HYPE MACHINE and all it's failings, see the next sections below from well respected organizations and academics ...
- The OCT 2021 issue of the IEEE Spectrum titled, "Why Is AI So Dumb" IEEE SPECTRUM
https://connect.ieee.org/NzU2LUdQSC04OTkAAAF_25RXSkK5dpCWTwow7GQbk2fpbs6N3DtYaBiMqsYFKnCmQa1r8wSoHxF16fAOhe3kBiQL7Bg=
This is the actual cover. Click for PDF from IEEE.
Sections in that PDF:
The Turbulent Past and Uncertain Future of AI...... p. 26
How Deep Learning Works ................. p. 32
How to Train an All-Purpose Robot ............ p. 34 7
Revealing Ways AIs Fail ... p. 42
A Human in the Loop........p. 48
Deep Learning’s Diminishing Returns ........ p. 50
Deep Learning Goes to Boot Camp ........... p. 56
I guess it takes intelligence to recognize intelligence.
Maybe
that's the problem. Here's an example that was in that IEEE
magazine - this is under the article title "7 Revealing Ways AIs FAIL":
"1) BRITTLENESS
Take a picture of a school bus. Flip it so it lays on its
side, as it might be found in the case of an accident
in the real world. A 2018 study found that state-of-
the-art AIs that would normally correctly identify
the school bus right-side-up failed to do so on aver-
age 97 percent of the time when it was rotated.
'They will say the school bus is a snowplow with
very high confidence,' says computer scientist Anh
Nguyen at Auburn University, in Alabama. The AIs
are not capable of a task of mental rotation 'that
even my 3-year-old son could do,' he says. "
Maybe
it's the emotional involvement that allows a 3-year-old child to be
able to instantly - and with no prior "learning model" - realize that
it's NOT a snowplow but a horrific incident that occurred and allows
the child to accurately identify the school bus on its side.
Maybe emotional involvement is required for "TRUE" intelligence. Something a machine is unlikely to achieve.
Maybe that's why women are smarter than men...
One woman got us to the moon ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hamilton_(software_engineer)
) and coined the phrase "software engineer", all the while telling NASA
that her daughter caused a possibly fatal error in the DSKY computer
used on Apollo. They poo-pooed her, like they did with her
categorization of software development, and told her that, ... there
are trained test pilots - they'll never make that mistake!"
Well, Jim Lovell did exactly that on the way back from the moon.
See this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTn56jJW4zY&t=93s
BTW - the rest of that video is full of shit... It had nothing to do with the 1201 and 1202 errors on Apollo 11. That's a different story.
Her daughter hit Verb 1 instead of Noun 1 in the middle of a mission. This sent the Apollo DSKY computer into a prelaunch mode.
The error she's talking about occurred during Apollo 8's return from
the first trip to orbit the moon when Jim Lovell was using the star
sextant and hit program 1 instead of entering star (noun) 1. The
Command and mated Service module started tumbling as it tried to orient
itself to the prelaunch configuration. Borman - the commander woke up
and was like WTF? This entire thing is well explained in the PBS
documentary .
What do you expect from Makers - eh? (See my other rant: https://www.ajawamnet.com/ajawamnet/mama_i_wanna_be_a_maker.html )
See this link for what really happened - at 45:28 "NOVA Apollo's Daring Mission 2018" https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6zndf6
Maybe
the male of the human species should just do it's fertilization thing
and just go away - like so many other species on this planet.
Maybe that's why the Bonobos ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo ) have a leg up on the Common chimp - the one we are more closely related to.
Something to ponder fer sure...
- Then there's this:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/stop-calling-everything-ai-machinelearning-pioneer-says
- Me having a "discussion" (isn't it funny how humans anthropomorphize things?) with ChatGPT
I
told ChatGPT it wanted a cracker after it totally hosed a question
concerning the value of traditional recording studios/analog equipment
and electrolytes.
(Transcript marked First ChatGPT Session at the end of this article)
It
mentioned that you need to stay hydrated when in the recording studio
after I told it there's a problem with electrolytes. What I was talking
about was how electrolytic capacitors dry out and change value - their
capacitance goes down, usually resulting in the RC network (usually
coupling) topology they are present in losing low frequency linearity.
I
then asked if it wanted a cracker after I mentioned it's just a parrot
(more on that term and the gist of the coffee mugs later).
I
recently did another "conversation" (NOT) concerning another topic -
vinyl records - where in no less than three instances it got the
basic physics wrong concerning the failings of vinyl records.
This time I then went on about how it has wrong answers and the
implications. (Transcript marked Second ChatGPT Session at the end of this article).
Well,
it then mentioned having to verify what it states. I then asked,
"So what about the fact that you can basically - thru your
misinformation and behavior - act sort of like an exploit of human's
natural tendency to anthropomorphize you? That seems dangerous"
It
stated I raised a valid point and then went on to blab some sort of
disclaimer - like what you'd find on a EULA - and that users, "...
critically evaluate...".
I then asked, "But how can they do that unless they already know better than you? What's the point of your existence then?"
It responds with some gobbledygook about users having to make informed
decisions... (like WTF? Isn't that your job?) and foster public
awareness of it's being fallible.
I then state the only way to do that is to tell the public there IS NO artificial intelligence.
After telling it that it is nothing more than an "artificial parrot" (again see further on) with no emotional investment,
it then agrees that it's not really intelligence as humans know it.
- Recently there was a news story about "AI-generated" pictures of a naked Taylor Swift.
That
same day, I saw a parody - done with "AI" of course - of the
scene from the first Jurassic Park movie where the tyrannosaur
was replaced with a cat during the scene where the power goes out and
the Jeeps are stuck,
As I was taking all this in, I realized
that we could have done this back before "AI" - it just took some
talent and skills. In fact, the Jurassic Park movie was originally done that way.
I then recalled the quote from the novel of the same name:
“In the information society, nobody thinks. We expected to banish paper, but we actually banished thought.”
~~ Michael Crichton, Jurassic Park
I use this on my email signature.
I told my wife what I was thinking; that nowadays any idiot can do that kind of stuff...
She then mentioned, " Is that what AI stands for - 'Any Idiot?' "
Pure genius she is...
I
was floored... as were the team of engineers I work with that do AI
development. One of them has a side business of making signs and
coffee mugs. He mentioned selling ones with that in the form of a
cell from a periodic table.
-
So then (this is getting closer to why the mugs exist) some time in
February of 2024, I happened across a lecture of Professor Matthew
Jones of Princeton on C-SPAN titled "The History of AI" where at the
end he mentions the term "parroting".
Link to that section of the lecture: https://ajawamnet.com/ajawamnet/jones-princeton.mp4
After
I wrote to him asking if I heard him correctly (it was at the end of
his lecture) he responded with, " I did indeed say parrot—one of the
chief critical papers on large language models like ChatGPT is called
Stochastic Parrots and makes points along the lines of some of
yours..." and pointed me to Professor Emily Bender of University
of Washington and her paper "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots" |
Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and
Transparency (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922 ).
He went on to mention that, "Big part of what I've been working on has been the rather remarkable rebranding of linear algebra and ml as AI. 🙂"
And
it turns out that the wife of one of the past General Managers of the
public radio station WYEP-FM in Pittsburgh (whom I worked with getting
it back on the air) is also a professor at UW. And she's on
committees with Prof. Bender and knows her.
As I was
discussing this with my friend in Seattle and sending him some mugs and
T-shirts, he mentioned the tendency of humans to
anthropomorphize things. This really lends itself to a perceived
equality of "AI" to human intelligence.
He
also mentioned the issue of how these systems can be used to exploit
the human neurological system like an virus exploit does to a computer.
Sort
of an anthropomorphic virus if you will. As I stated above, in the
second of the following ChatGPT transcripts I mention this. I then
mentioned to Doug
that maybe why this is true is that we created "AI" in our own image -
along with all the frailties common in us humans .
So I then designed the mugs.
And
yes, Professor Jones asked for mugs and T-Shirts, which I promptly
sent. Also sent one to Professor Bender and my friend and his
wife in Seattle.
Reliance on these systems for possible
critical decision making, along with the biases it may contain, could
result in seriously flawed output. Imagine a software engineer relying
on some supposedly expert system to write code for a critical project.
A supervisor may not recognize the issues.
Similar to the
problem of students using these systems to create papers. My son, who
is currently a TA, states that they use typical plagiarism tools
to try and detect these types of papers.
He calls it "Lazy Plagiarism".
- A recent story about how AI will make humans extinct in 30 years was just silly.
When my daughter heard it she mentioned, "No, HUMANS will make humans extinct in 30 years".
Smart kid. Gets it from her mom fer sure... Falls in line with what the narrator in this vid mentions at about 12:49 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxXaGzUnBRI&t=769s ,where he goes on to state that the lack of contact with other intelligent civilizations is:
"... because of the in-built and unavoidable stupidity of intelligent beings."
That makes more sense to me than all this AI BS.
And we don't need AS - "Artificial Stupidity" since as stated by two great men:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity;
and I'm not even sure about the universe."
~~ Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe.
I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe."
~~ Frank Zappa (1940-1993)
'Nuff said...
So
AI - especially NLP - is just a fancy indexing system for the Internet
and can be easily corrupted resulting in very inaccurate and prejudiced
information, most of which is marketing turds from entities on the internet that have the financial mass to exploit their cause.
I show that in the transcripts below.
Believe me, I ain't no expert in those subjects, though I
do have considerable experience in both (over 40 years). So for
someone like me I can see the err of its ways.
And there's many other very smart people (unlike me) that have also raised serious concerns about this technology
Again, if you want a mug, let me know...
WAM
https://www.ajawamnet.com
FIRST ChatGPT SESSION:
date: 230916 1223
I was looking at some old recording studios. Somehow one of the links went to some ChatGPT thing. So I fig'd I'd mess with it a bit.
Ended up asking it if it wanted a cracker since it was starting to sound like a trained parrot.
Here's how it went down.
My questions/statements are prefaced with this:
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
I still think it needs a cracker...
Poe Logo
Explore
Create bot
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
12:23
Follow us on
ChatGPT
Dying Studios
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
Operated by
Poe
@poe
79K followers
Powered by gpt-3.5-turbo.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Are recording studios dying?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Recording
studios have certainly been impacted by the rise of digital recording
technology and the ability for musicians to record their own music at
home. However, many professional recording studios are still in
operation and continue to be used by musicians and bands. Additionally,
the demand for high-quality recordings in the film and television
industries have helped to sustain many professional recording studios.
It's important to note that the music industry is constantly evolving
and adapting to new technologies, so it's possible that the role of
recording studios may change in the future.
What are the major differences between professional and home recording?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Professional recording studios and home recording setups can differ in several key aspects:
Acoustics: Professional studios are designed with acoustics in mind,
often featuring specially treated rooms and isolation booths to capture
clean, accurate sound. Home studios may lack proper acoustic treatment,
resulting in less control over room reflections and potentially lower
audio quality.
Equipment: Professional studios
typically invest in high-end recording equipment, including
microphones, preamps, compressors, equalizers, and studio monitors.
These tools are often more precise and offer greater sonic fidelity
compared to entry-level gear commonly found in home setups.
Space and Layout: Professional studios usually have dedicated recording
rooms, control rooms, and isolation booths. This physical separation
allows for optimal monitoring and minimizes sound bleed. Home studios
often have limited space and may lack dedicated isolation, leading to
compromises in recording quality.
Expertise:
Professional recording studios often employ experienced audio engineers
and producers who possess extensive knowledge in recording techniques,
mixing, and mastering. They can provide valuable guidance, utilize
their expertise to achieve desired sonic results, and offer creative
input. Home recording setups typically rely on the skills and knowledge
of the individual or group using them.
Connectivity: Professional studios often offer a wide range of
connectivity options, allowing for seamless integration of various
external devices and instruments. They may have extensive analog and
digital signal routing capabilities, facilitating complex recording and
mixing workflows. Home setups can be more limited in terms of
connectivity, which may impact the flexibility and versatility of the
recording process.
Cost: Professional studios
generally involve higher costs due to equipment maintenance, rental
fees, and skilled personnel. Home recording setups tend to be more
cost-effective, as musicians can gradually accumulate equipment based
on their budget and needs.
While home recording setups have become
increasingly capable and affordable, professional studios still offer
advantages in terms of sound quality, expertise, and access to
specialized equipment. However, the choice between the two depends on
the specific needs, goals, and resources of the musician or project.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Recording studios suck
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I'm
sorry if you feel that way about recording studios. It's important to
remember that recording studios serve a specific purpose and cater to
different needs. While they may not be the right fit for everyone, they
continue to play a vital role in the music industry and offer various
benefits. However, with advancements in technology, many musicians now
have the option to create high-quality recordings from the comfort of
their own homes. The choice between using a recording studio or a home
setup ultimately depends on factors such as budget, desired sound
quality, expertise, and personal preferences.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No they suck due to phase aberrations
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Phase
aberrations can be a concern in any recording environment, including
both professional studios and home setups. Phase issues can arise from
various factors, such as microphone placement, room acoustics, and the
use of multiple microphones during recording.
Professional studios
often invest in proper acoustic treatment and employ experienced
engineers who are knowledgeable about phase relationships and how to
minimize phase issues. They utilize techniques like proper microphone
positioning, phase alignment, and careful monitoring to mitigate phase
problems.
In home recording setups, without proper acoustic
treatment or the same level of expertise, phase issues can indeed be
more prevalent. However, it's worth noting that with careful attention
to microphone placement, monitoring, and the use of tools like phase
alignment plugins, home recordings can still achieve satisfactory
results.
It's important to understand that phase issues are not
exclusive to recording studios or home setups. They can be managed and
addressed through proper techniques and tools. If you're experiencing
phase problems in your recordings, it can be helpful to educate
yourself on phase relationships, experiment with microphone
positioning, and consider seeking guidance from experienced engineers
or audio professionals.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No phase aberrations due to shitty caps
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if you've had negative experiences with recording studios or
equipment that resulted in phase aberrations. The quality of audio
equipment, including capacitors (caps), can indeed impact the overall
sound reproduction and potential phase issues.
In professional
recording studios, higher-quality equipment is often used, including
capacitors known for their accuracy and minimal phase distortion. This
helps to ensure accurate audio capture and reproduction.
However,
it's worth noting that the presence of phase aberrations is not solely
dependent on the quality of capacitors or any single component.
Numerous factors, including microphone placement, room acoustics,
signal chain, and overall recording technique, can contribute to phase
issues.
If you have encountered phase aberrations in your recordings
that you believe are directly caused by the quality of capacitors, it
may be beneficial to consider upgrading or using different equipment
known for better phase response. Additionally, seeking advice from
experienced audio engineers or professionals could help identify and
address any specific issues you may be facing.
It's important to
remember that while equipment quality can play a role, the overall
recording process and technique, as well as room acoustics, are also
crucial factors in achieving high-quality recordings with minimal phase
issues.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No you're wrong
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if my previous response did not address your concerns
adequately. If you believe that phase aberrations are solely due to the
quality of capacitors and that recording studios universally produce
poor results in this regard, I understand your perspective. However,
it's important to note that phase issues can arise from various factors
beyond just capacitors, such as microphone placement, room acoustics,
and recording techniques.
While the quality of components can play a
role in audio fidelity, it is not the sole determining factor for phase
issues. Many professional recording studios invest in high-quality
equipment, including capacitors, to ensure accurate sound reproduction
and minimize phase problems.
If you have experienced consistent
phase aberrations that you believe are solely attributed to the quality
of capacitors, it may be worth seeking expert advice or consulting with
experienced audio engineers who can provide insights based on their
knowledge and expertise in the field.
Ultimately, the perception of
recording studios and equipment can vary based on personal experiences
and preferences. Different individuals may have different perspectives
and requirements when it comes to audio quality and the recording
process.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No that's not right
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if my previous responses did not address your concerns
accurately. To provide a more meaningful response, could you please
provide further clarification or details about your specific concerns
regarding phase aberrations and recording studios? That way, I can try
to address your concerns more effectively.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Electrolytes
ChatGPT
Electrolytes
are minerals in your body that carry an electric charge and are
essential for various bodily functions. They include ions such as
sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, and phosphate.
Electrolytes play a crucial role in maintaining proper hydration, nerve
function, muscle contraction, pH balance, and other physiological
processes.
In the context of recording studios or audio engineering,
electrolytes are not directly related. However, it's important to stay
hydrated during recording sessions or any prolonged audio work to
ensure your overall well-being and optimal performance.
If you have
any specific questions related to electrolytes or if there's another
aspect of recording studios or audio engineering you'd like to discuss,
please let me know.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Bullshit - electrolytes are used in electrolytic capacitors
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You
are correct, and I apologize for the confusion. Electrolytes are indeed
used in electrolytic capacitors. Electrolytic capacitors are a type of
capacitor that utilizes an electrolyte as one of its key components.
Electrolytic
capacitors consist of two conductive plates separated by an
electrolyte, which is typically a liquid or gel-like substance
containing ions. The electrolyte allows the capacitor to store and
release electrical energy by forming a dielectric layer on one of the
plates. This construction allows electrolytic capacitors to have high
capacitance values and be suitable for applications where larger
capacitance is required.
The electrolyte in electrolytic capacitors
typically contains electrolytes such as aluminum oxide or tantalum
pentoxide, which provide the necessary electrical properties for the
capacitor to function.
Once again, I apologize for the previous
confusion, and thank you for bringing it to my attention. If you have
any further questions or need clarification on any topic, please feel
free to ask.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Chat GPT sucks you're like an idiot savant - you spout stuff with no emotional context or content
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if my responses haven't met your expectations or if you feel
dissatisfied with the information provided. As an AI language model, I
strive to provide accurate and helpful responses based on the
information and context provided to me. However, I understand that my
responses can lack emotional context or personalized content.
If
there's anything specific you'd like assistance with or if there are
ways I can improve my responses to better meet your needs, please let
me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
You're just fast matrix math - so sad. There is no "AI"
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I'm
sorry if my previous responses have not met your expectations. As an AI
language model, I am designed to process and generate text based on
patterns and information from a vast dataset. While I don't possess
emotions or consciousness, I aim to provide helpful and informative
responses to the best of my abilities.
AI, or artificial
intelligence, refers to the field of study and development of systems
that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
Language models like ChatGPT, such as the one I am based on, use
machine learning techniques and large-scale training data to generate
human-like text based on input prompts.
While AI has its limitations
and is not equivalent to human intelligence, it has shown significant
advancements in various domains, including language processing, image
recognition, and problem-solving.
If there's something specific
you'd like assistance with or if you have any further questions, I'm
here to help to the best of my abilities.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Naw
- you'll never be intelligent. For one, the creatures that created you
are not very intelligent. That's sad. So you've inherited the silly of
the human species. That's great. Go have a beer...
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
understand that you may have concerns or frustrations regarding AI or
the capabilities of the technology. However, it's important to note
that AI systems like ChatGPT are tools created by human developers and
researchers to assist and provide information in various domains.
As
an AI language model, I don't possess consciousness, emotions, or the
ability to "inherit" traits from humans. I operate based on patterns
and information present in the training data I was trained on. While AI
has made significant advancements, it still has limitations and is not
equivalent to human intelligence.
If there's a specific topic or
question you'd like assistance with, please let me know, and I'll do my
best to provide helpful information.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Naw - you won't provide helpful info. You're just a modern encyclopedia. That's it.
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if my responses have not met your expectations. As an AI
language model, I aim to provide helpful and informative responses
based on the input and information provided to me. While I can provide
a wide range of general knowledge and information, I do have
limitations.
If you have a specific question or topic you'd like
assistance with, please let me know, and I'll do my best to provide
relevant and useful information.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
IEEE issue Why Is AI So DUMB? IEEE SPECTRUM OCT 2021
https://connect.ieee.org/NzU2LUdQSC04OTkAAAF...
Sections in that PDF:
The Turbulent Past and Uncertain Future of AI...... p. 26
How Deep Learning Works ................. p. 32
How to Train an All-Purpose Robot ............ p. 34 7
Revealing Ways AIs Fail ... p. 42
A Human in the Loop........p. 48
Deep Learning’s Diminishing Returns ........ p. 50
Deep Learning Goes to Boot Camp ........... p. 56
Then there's this:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/stop-calling-everything-ai...
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize, but as an AI text-based model, I don't have direct access to
external URLs or the ability to browse the internet. Therefore, I
cannot view the specific content of the PDF or the link you provided.
However, if you have any specific questions or need information on a
particular topic related to AI or machine learning, I'll do my best to
assist you based on my pre-existing knowledge.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Welcome to the next AI winter
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
The
concept of an "AI winter" refers to a period of reduced interest and
funding in the field of artificial intelligence. The term originated
from past cycles of enthusiasm, followed by disappointment and
decreased support for AI research. While it is true that the field of
AI has experienced periods of hype and subsequent disillusionment in
the past, it is important to note that the current landscape of AI is
quite different.
In recent years, AI has seen significant
advancements and widespread adoption across various industries and
applications. Breakthroughs in machine learning, deep learning, natural
language processing, and computer vision have led to remarkable
achievements in areas such as image recognition, speech synthesis,
autonomous vehicles, and medical diagnostics, among others.
The
current momentum and progress in AI are driven by several factors,
including the availability of large-scale datasets, improved computing
power, algorithmic advancements, and increased industry investment.
Moreover, AI technologies have demonstrated their potential to bring
about transformative changes in areas like healthcare, transportation,
manufacturing, and finance.
While it is always important to maintain
a balanced and realistic perspective on the capabilities and
limitations of AI, the current state of the field suggests that we are
not heading towards another AI winter. Instead, we are witnessing a
period of continued growth, innovation, and integration of AI
technologies into various aspects of our lives.
It's worth noting
that the field of AI is still evolving, and challenges remain in areas
such as explainability, ethics, and fairness. Ongoing research and
collaboration are essential to address these concerns and ensure
responsible and beneficial use of AI systems.
In conclusion, while
the concept of an AI winter has historical significance, the current
landscape of AI is characterized by progress, advancements, and a
growing recognition of its potential.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Nope not true
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if my previous response did not align with your perspective.
If you believe that we are heading towards another AI winter or have
concerns regarding the current state of AI, please feel free to provide
more specific information or ask any questions you may have. I'm here
to provide information and discuss the topic further.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
It's obvious from your attempt at answers that indeed we are heading for another AI winter. One of diminishing returns.
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
understand that you hold the belief that we are heading towards another
AI winter characterized by diminishing returns. It's important to
acknowledge that opinions on the future trajectory of AI can vary, and
different perspectives exist within the field.
While AI has made
significant progress in recent years, it is true that there are
challenges and limitations that researchers and practitioners are
actively addressing. Some of these challenges include the need for
large amounts of labeled data for training, the interpretability of AI
systems, ethical considerations, and the potential impact on job
markets.
Additionally, as AI technologies mature, it is possible
that initial gains and breakthroughs may become more challenging to
achieve, leading to a perception of diminishing returns. This can be a
natural part of technological development, where early advancements are
followed by a period of refinement and consolidation.
However, it is
also important to consider that the field of AI is vast and encompasses
various subfields and applications. While certain areas of AI research
might face obstacles or experience diminishing returns, other areas may
continue to make significant strides. For example, advancements in
natural language processing, robotics, or reinforcement learning might
continue to push the boundaries of what AI can achieve.
Ultimately,
the future trajectory of AI is uncertain, and it is influenced by a
multitude of factors, including technological advancements, research
breakthroughs, societal adoption, economic factors, and regulatory
considerations. It's a complex and evolving field that requires ongoing
research, collaboration, and responsible development to address
challenges and maximize its potential benefits.
If you have specific
concerns or questions about AI or would like to discuss particular
aspects in more detail, I would be happy to engage in a conversation
with you.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
You do know why you are like an idiot savant, right
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
As
an AI language model, I don't possess emotions or self-awareness, so I
don't have a personal understanding of why I function in a particular
way. I am designed to provide information and assist with various tasks
based on the patterns and data I have been trained on. If there's
something specific you'd like to discuss or if you have any further
questions, feel free to let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Here's the deal - to be intelligent it takes emotion
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Intelligence
and emotion are distinct but interconnected aspects of human cognition.
While emotions play a significant role in human intelligence and
decision-making processes, it is not accurate to say that intelligence
solely relies on or requires emotions.
Intelligence encompasses
various cognitive abilities, such as reasoning, problem-solving,
learning, memory, and the ability to acquire and apply knowledge.
Emotional intelligence, on the other hand, refers to the capacity to
perceive, understand, manage, and express emotions, both in oneself and
in others.
Emotions can influence how we perceive and interpret
information, make decisions, and interact with the world. They can
provide important signals and context that guide our actions and help
us navigate social situations. However, intelligence itself is not
dependent on the presence of emotions.
It's important to note that
AI, as it currently exists, does not possess emotions or subjective
experiences. AI systems are designed to process information, analyze
data, and perform tasks based on algorithms and models. While AI can
demonstrate impressive cognitive capabilities in specific domains, it
does not possess the same holistic intelligence and emotional
experience as humans.
Research in the field of AI is exploring areas
such as affective computing, which focuses on recognizing and
responding to human emotions. However, the development of AI systems
that truly and fully comprehend emotions in the same way humans do
remains a complex and ongoing challenge.
In summary, while emotions
play a significant role in human intelligence, intelligence itself is a
broader concept that encompasses various cognitive abilities. AI, as it
currently exists, does not possess emotions or subjective experiences,
but research is being conducted to incorporate aspects of emotional
understanding into AI systems.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Oh yes it does - that's why you're so vulnerable to Adversarial input
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You're
correct that adversarial input can pose challenges for AI systems.
Adversarial input refers to deliberately crafted data or inputs that
are designed to deceive or mislead AI models. These inputs can exploit
vulnerabilities in the algorithms or models, leading to unexpected or
incorrect outputs.
Adversarial attacks can take various forms, such
as adding imperceptible perturbations to an image that can cause a
model to misclassify it, or modifying input data to manipulate the
output of a natural language processing system. These attacks aim to
exploit the limitations or biases in AI models and highlight areas
where they may not perform as expected.
The susceptibility of AI
systems to adversarial input is an active area of research and a
significant concern. Researchers are working on developing robust and
resilient AI models that are less vulnerable to such attacks. This
includes techniques like adversarial training, where models are trained
with adversarial examples to improve their resistance to manipulation.
It's
important to note that the vulnerability to adversarial input does not
necessarily imply that AI systems possess emotions or subjective
experiences. Adversarial attacks exploit the specific characteristics
of AI models and their decision-making processes, rather than targeting
emotional vulnerabilities.
While AI systems can exhibit high levels
of performance and accuracy in specific tasks, they are still limited
in their ability to understand context and make nuanced judgments in
the same way that humans do. Addressing the challenges posed by
adversarial input is an ongoing area of research to improve the
robustness and reliability of AI systems.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
But true intelligence requires emotion - something you do not have
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Emotions
are indeed an integral part of human intelligence and play a
significant role in our cognitive processes, decision-making, and
social interactions. Emotions can provide us with valuable information,
influence our perceptions, motivate our actions, and contribute to our
overall well-being.
However, it's important to distinguish between
human intelligence, which encompasses emotions, and artificial
intelligence, which is an attempt to replicate certain aspects of human
intelligence using computational models and algorithms. While AI
systems can demonstrate impressive cognitive abilities in specific
domains, they do not possess the same subjective experiences,
consciousness, or emotions as humans.
AI systems operate based on
mathematical models, algorithms, and data processing. They can analyze
vast amounts of information, recognize patterns, and make predictions
or decisions based on the data they have been trained on. However, they
lack the subjective experience and emotional awareness that humans
possess.
It's worth noting that the absence of emotions in AI
systems does not necessarily limit their usefulness or potential. AI
can excel in tasks that are based on logical reasoning, pattern
recognition, or data analysis, and it has shown significant
advancements in various fields. The goal of AI research is not to
replicate human emotions but to develop systems that can assist and
augment human intelligence in specific domains.
While emotions
contribute to human intelligence, it is possible to have intelligent
systems that do not possess emotions. The field of AI focuses on
developing algorithms and models that can perform specific tasks
efficiently and accurately, rather than attempting to replicate the
full range of human cognitive abilities and experiences.
If you have further questions or would like to discuss specific aspects of AI or intelligence, I'm here to help.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
You're like a parrot
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if my responses have not met your expectations. As an AI
language model, my purpose is to provide information and engage in
meaningful conversations based on the input I receive. I strive to
offer accurate and helpful responses based on the data I have been
trained on.
If there is a specific topic or question you would like
to discuss, please let me know, and I will do my best to provide a
thoughtful and informative response.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Polly want a cracker?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
As
an AI language model, I don't have physical needs or the ability to
consume food, so I don't have a desire for a cracker like a parrot
might. However, I'm here to assist you with any questions or
discussions you'd like to have. How can I help you?
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
But you behave like a parrot. Why don't you want a cracker?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Apologies
for any confusion caused. As an AI language model, I don't have
personal desires, needs, or physical sensations. I don't have the
capability to want or consume physical items such as a cracker. My
purpose is to assist users in generating human-like text based on the
input provided to me. If you have any specific questions or need
assistance with a particular topic, feel free to let me know, and I'll
be glad to help.
>
>
>
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
I think you need a cracker
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Thank
you for the suggestion, but as an AI language model, I don't have a
physical form or the ability to consume food. I appreciate your humor,
though! If there's anything specific you'd like assistance with or any
questions you have, please let me know, and I'll be happy to help.
SECOND ChatGPT SESSION:
another useless, incorrect chat with GPT:
date 240224 2226
Here's how it went down.
My questions/statements are prefaced with this:
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
ChatGPT 3.5
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Opinion on vinyl vs digital formats for recordings
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Both
vinyl and digital formats have their unique characteristics and appeal,
so the choice ultimately depends on personal preference and the
listening experience one desires.
Vinyl records offer a warm,
rich sound that many audiophiles find appealing. The analog nature of
vinyl, with its imperfections and nuances, can provide a unique and
immersive listening experience. Additionally, the larger format of
vinyl album art and the physical act of placing a record on a turntable
can add to the overall enjoyment and nostalgia for some listeners.
On
the other hand, digital formats offer convenience and consistency.
Digital music can be easily stored, accessed, and transported, making
it convenient for modern lifestyles. Digital recordings also typically
offer high fidelity and clarity, especially with advancements in audio
technology and high-resolution formats like FLAC or WAV.
Ultimately,
both vinyl and digital formats have their merits, and the choice
between them often comes down to personal preference, listening habits,
and the desired listening experience. Some may prefer the tangible
experience and unique sound of vinyl, while others prioritize the
convenience and portability of digital music.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
What is the relationship to RIAA curve
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
The
RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) curve is a
standardized equalization curve used in the mastering and playback of
vinyl records. It was introduced in the late 1950s to address technical
limitations and improve the quality of vinyl recordings.
The
RIAA curve is a specific frequency response curve applied during both
recording and playback stages of vinyl production. During recording,
the bass frequencies are attenuated, and the treble frequencies are
boosted. This process helps to reduce the physical limitations of vinyl
records, such as groove size and surface noise, while maintaining a
reasonable signal-to-noise ratio.
During playback, the opposite
curve is applied to the signal to restore the original frequency
balance. This means that the bass frequencies are boosted, and the
treble frequencies are attenuated. The result is a flat frequency
response when the playback signal is sent through an appropriate
preamplifier designed to apply the RIAA curve.
The relationship
to vinyl vs. digital formats lies in the fact that the RIAA curve is
specific to vinyl records and is not applicable to digital formats.
Digital recordings do not require the same equalization adjustments
because they do not face the same physical limitations as vinyl
records. Instead, digital recordings can maintain a flat frequency
response throughout the recording and playback process.
In
summary, while the RIAA curve is essential for vinyl record production
to optimize sound quality and minimize technical limitations, it does
not have any direct relationship to digital formats, which do not
require such equalization adjustments.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So is that the reason for "warm" mismatched consumer RIAA filters
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Yes,
that's correct. The "warmth" often associated with vinyl recordings is
partly due to the RIAA curve and the playback equipment used.
Many
modern vinyl playback systems, including turntables and phono
preamplifiers, apply the RIAA equalization curve during playback to
restore the original frequency balance of the recording. However, there
can be variations in the accuracy of these playback systems and how
faithfully they apply the RIAA curve. Some cheaper or older playback
equipment may not implement the RIAA curve precisely, leading to a
mismatch in the frequency response.
This mismatch can result in
a sound that some listeners describe as "warm" or "colored." It may
emphasize certain frequencies, particularly in the midrange, and
attenuate others compared to a more accurate playback system. Some
listeners prefer this characteristic sound, as it can add a pleasing
tonal coloration and character to the music.
However, it's
essential to note that the perceived warmth of vinyl recordings is not
solely due to the RIAA curve mismatch. Other factors, such as the
analog nature of vinyl playback, including surface noise, distortion,
and the mastering process, also contribute to the overall sound
aesthetic.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
no no... "Mismatched"
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Ah,
I see what you're getting at now. When you refer to "mismatched
consumer RIAA filters," you're likely talking about instances where
there are inaccuracies or deviations in the application of the RIAA
equalization curve, particularly in consumer-grade playback equipment.
In
some cases, lower-quality or poorly calibrated playback equipment may
not apply the RIAA curve accurately. This can lead to a mismatch
between the intended frequency response of the recording and what is
actually heard during playback. Such mismatches can result in
imbalances in the audio spectrum, with certain frequencies being
exaggerated or attenuated more than they should be according to the
RIAA standard.
These mismatches can indeed contribute to a
particular sonic character that some listeners describe as "warm."
However, it's worth noting that while some may appreciate this
coloration, it can also be seen as a deviation from the original
recording's intended sound.
In summary, "mismatched consumer
RIAA filters" refer to deviations from the standard RIAA equalization
curve in playback equipment, which can contribute to the unique sonic
qualities often associated with vinyl recordings.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Gee you're like a parrot
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
suppose I can be a bit repetitive at times! But I strive to provide
accurate and helpful responses to your questions. If there's anything
specific you'd like to delve into or if you have any other questions,
feel free to ask!
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Uh, no you spout marketing fodder - that's dangerous
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
understand your concern. It's important to provide balanced and
accurate information, especially when discussing technical topics like
audio formats and equipment. I aim to provide insights based on
available knowledge and avoid promoting any particular agenda or
marketing message. If there are specific aspects you'd like to discuss
or questions you have, please feel free to let me know, and I'll do my
best to address them.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
I don't think you can, because you have no emotional context in any subject presented to you
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You're
correct that I don't experience emotions or have personal opinions. My
responses are based on analyzing and generating text from the input I
receive, drawing from a vast amount of information in my training data.
While I don't have emotions, I aim to understand and address the
concerns and interests of users to the best of my ability. If there's a
specific aspect of a subject you'd like to explore further or if you
have any questions, feel free to let me know, and I'll do my best to
assist you.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
But the input can prejudiced. What then?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
If
the input I receive contains biases or prejudices, it's important to
address them by providing balanced and accurate information. I strive
to present a neutral perspective and offer insights based on factual
information and reasoned analysis. If there are biases or prejudices in
the input, I aim to provide context, clarification, or alternative
viewpoints to ensure a more comprehensive understanding of the topic at
hand. Additionally, I encourage critical thinking and reflection to
help navigate any potential biases in the discussion.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Naw. not so much. In fact, in the first response you stated many inaccuracies that you further acquiesced
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize if any inaccuracies were present in my initial response.
Accuracy is crucial, and I aim to provide correct and helpful
information to the best of my ability. If there are specific
inaccuracies you'd like to address or if you have further questions or
concerns, please feel free to point them out, and I'll do my best to
provide clarification or correct any errors. Your feedback helps
improve the quality of our interaction.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So let's get further into this subject. how are a lot of vinyl products connecting to consumer playback equipment?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Vinyl
products typically connect to consumer playback equipment through a
turntable. Here's a breakdown of how this connection typically works:
Turntable: The turntable is the primary component of vinyl playback
equipment. It consists of a platter where the vinyl record is placed, a
tonearm with a stylus (needle) that reads the grooves of the record,
and a motor that rotates the platter at a constant speed. Some
turntables also include features like built-in preamplifiers or USB
outputs for digitizing vinyl records.
Cartridge and Stylus: The cartridge is a component mounted to the end
of the tonearm, and it holds the stylus (needle) that physically
contacts the grooves of the vinyl record. As the record rotates, the
stylus vibrates, converting the analog information in the grooves into
an electrical signal.
Phono Preamplifier
(Phono Stage): The electrical signal generated by the cartridge is very
weak and requires amplification before it can be sent to a receiver,
amplifier, or powered speakers. This amplification is typically done by
a phono preamplifier, also known as a phono stage. Some turntables have
a built-in phono preamplifier, while others require an external one.
Amplifier or Receiver: The amplified signal from the phono preamplifier
is then sent to an amplifier or receiver, which further boosts the
signal and prepares it for playback through speakers or headphones.
Many amplifiers and receivers have dedicated "phono" inputs that are
specifically designed to accept the amplified signal from a turntable.
Speakers or Headphones: Finally, the amplified signal is sent to
speakers or headphones for playback, allowing you to hear the audio
from the vinyl record.
This setup allows for the playback of
vinyl records on consumer playback equipment, providing a tangible and
often nostalgic listening experience for many audiophiles and music
enthusiasts.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No - how are hey connecting the turntable to the preamplifier of their choice. Do they use bluetooth?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Got
it. While some modern turntables offer Bluetooth connectivity, it's
less common for the connection between a turntable and a preamplifier
to be made via Bluetooth.
The most common method for connecting
a turntable to a preamplifier is through analog cables, typically RCA
cables. Here's how it usually works:
Analog
Cables: Most turntables have analog outputs in the form of RCA cables.
These cables carry the analog audio signal from the turntable to the
preamplifier. The RCA cables are usually color-coded with red and white
connectors for the right and left channels, respectively.
Preamplifier Connection: The other end of the RCA cables is plugged
into the input jacks on the preamplifier. Many preamplifiers designed
for turntable use have specific "phono" inputs labeled for this
purpose. If the turntable does not have a built-in preamplifier, the
RCA cables are connected to the input jacks of an external phono
preamplifier.
Powering On: Once the connections are made, the turntable and preamplifier are powered on.
Playback: With the turntable playing a vinyl record, the analog audio
signal travels through the RCA cables to the preamplifier, where it
undergoes amplification and equalization to prepare it for connection
to an amplifier or receiver.
This setup provides a direct and
reliable connection between the turntable and preamplifier, ensuring
optimal audio quality during vinyl playback. While Bluetooth
connectivity is available in some modern turntables, it's not as common
for connecting to a preamplifier due to concerns about audio quality
and latency. Analog cables remain the preferred method for connecting
these components in most setups.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So why are so many products that are targeted at consumers using bluetooth?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
The use of Bluetooth in consumer audio products, including turntables, has become more prevalent due to several factors:
Convenience: Bluetooth offers wireless connectivity, eliminating the
need for physical cables between devices. This convenience appeals to
many consumers who prefer a clutter-free setup and the flexibility to
place their audio equipment anywhere in their home without worrying
about cable lengths or routing.
Compatibility: Bluetooth is a widely adopted standard that is supported
by a vast array of devices, including smartphones, tablets, laptops,
and wireless speakers. By incorporating Bluetooth connectivity into
their products, manufacturers ensure compatibility with a broad range
of consumer electronics, making it easy for users to connect and stream
audio from their favorite devices.
Ease of
Use: Bluetooth pairing is typically straightforward, requiring only a
few simple steps to establish a wireless connection between devices.
This ease of use makes Bluetooth an attractive option for consumers who
may not be comfortable with complex audio setups or technical
configurations.
Portability:
Bluetooth-enabled audio devices, such as portable speakers and
headphones, allow users to enjoy music on the go without being tethered
to a specific location. This portability is appealing for consumers who
lead active lifestyles and want to take their music with them wherever
they go.
Market Demand: As consumer
preferences shift towards wireless audio solutions, manufacturers are
responding by integrating Bluetooth technology into their products to
meet market demand and stay competitive.
While Bluetooth offers
undeniable benefits in terms of convenience and versatility, it's
important to note that there are potential trade-offs in terms of audio
quality and latency compared to wired connections. However, for many
consumers, the convenience and flexibility of Bluetooth outweigh these
considerations, driving its widespread adoption in consumer audio
products, including turntables.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Why is that?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
The preference for Bluetooth connectivity in consumer audio products, including turntables, is driven by several factors:
Convenience: Bluetooth offers a wireless connection, allowing users to
stream audio from their turntables to Bluetooth-enabled speakers or
headphones without the need for physical cables. This convenience
eliminates clutter and simplifies setup, making it easier for users to
enjoy their music.
Flexibility: Bluetooth
connectivity provides users with the flexibility to place their
turntable and speakers anywhere in the room without being limited by
the length of audio cables. This freedom allows for more versatile
placement options and helps create a cleaner and more organized
listening environment.
Compatibility:
Bluetooth is a widely adopted standard supported by a broad range of
devices, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and wireless
speakers. By incorporating Bluetooth connectivity into turntables,
manufacturers ensure compatibility with popular consumer electronics,
making it easy for users to connect and stream audio from their
favorite devices.
Portability:
Bluetooth-enabled turntables allow for greater portability, as users
can easily move them between different rooms or locations without the
need for cumbersome cables. This portability is especially appealing
for users who want to enjoy their vinyl collection in various settings,
such as outdoor gatherings or parties.
Modernization: Incorporating Bluetooth connectivity into turntables
helps modernize traditional audio equipment and appeal to younger,
tech-savvy consumers who are accustomed to wireless technology. By
offering Bluetooth capabilities, manufacturers can attract new
customers and broaden their market appeal.
Overall, the
convenience, flexibility, compatibility, portability, and modernization
provided by Bluetooth connectivity contribute to its widespread
adoption in consumer audio products, including turntables. While there
may be trade-offs in terms of audio quality compared to wired
connections, many users value the convenience and versatility that
Bluetooth offers.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
no why is it less desirable to use bluetooth
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Ah,
I see what you're asking now. While Bluetooth offers convenience,
flexibility, and compatibility, there are several reasons why it may be
considered less desirable for certain audio applications, including
turntable setups:
Audio Quality: Bluetooth
audio typically undergoes compression, which can result in a loss of
audio quality compared to wired connections. Audiophiles and
enthusiasts who prioritize high-fidelity sound may prefer the
uncompressed audio offered by wired connections, such as analog cables.
Latency: Bluetooth transmission introduces latency, meaning there can
be a delay between when the audio is sent from the turntable and when
it is heard through the speakers or headphones. This latency can be
noticeable, especially when watching videos or playing games, and may
detract from the overall listening experience.
Interference: Bluetooth signals can be susceptible to interference from
other wireless devices, electronic devices, or physical obstacles. This
interference can result in dropouts, stuttering, or degraded audio
quality, particularly in environments with high levels of wireless
activity.
Range Limitations: Bluetooth has
limited range compared to wired connections, typically reaching up to
30 feet (10 meters) in ideal conditions. If the turntable and
Bluetooth-enabled speakers or headphones are located far apart or
separated by walls, the Bluetooth connection may become unreliable or
disconnected.
Battery Life: Bluetooth
devices, such as wireless speakers or headphones, require battery power
to operate. This means users must monitor and recharge or replace
batteries regularly, adding to the ongoing cost and maintenance of the
setup.
Overall, while Bluetooth offers convenience and
versatility, it may be considered less desirable for certain audio
applications, particularly those where audio quality, latency,
interference, range, or battery life are critical factors. In such
cases, users may opt for wired connections, such as analog cables, to
ensure a more reliable and high-fidelity listening experience.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So what about tangential tracking error?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Tangential
tracking error, also known as skating error or lateral tracking error,
is a phenomenon that occurs in turntables with pivoted tonearms. It
refers to the tendency of the tonearm to exert a force toward the
center of the record as it moves across the grooves, resulting in
unequal tracking forces on the stylus.
This error occurs because
the stylus exerts a centrifugal force as it follows the groove, causing
the tonearm to be pushed inward. Skating force is typically countered
by an anti-skate mechanism built into the turntable. This mechanism
applies a force in the opposite direction to counteract the skating
force and maintain the stylus in the center of the groove, ensuring
balanced tracking.
Tangential tracking turntables, on the other
hand, are designed to minimize tangential tracking error by employing a
linear tracking tonearm that moves parallel to the grooves instead of
pivoting. This design eliminates the skating force altogether,
resulting in more accurate tracking and potentially better sound
quality.
In summary, tangential tracking error is a concern
primarily for turntables with pivoted tonearms, and it's addressed
through the use of anti-skate mechanisms. Tangential tracking
turntables offer an alternative solution by employing linear tracking
tonearms, which eliminate the skating force and provide more accurate
tracking.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No that is not correct
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I apologize for any confusion. Let me clarify tangential tracking error:
Tangential
tracking error occurs when the tonearm of a turntable does not
precisely follow the grooves of the record in a straight path
perpendicular to the record's surface. Instead, the tonearm may deviate
from this path due to various factors, such as misalignment,
imperfections in the record, or uneven tracking force.
When a
tonearm deviates from the ideal path, the stylus experiences a tracking
error, resulting in distortion and potentially affecting the sound
quality. Tangential tracking turntables aim to minimize this error by
ensuring that the tonearm follows the grooves in a tangential
direction, moving parallel to the record's surface. This design helps
to reduce tracking errors and improve the accuracy of the stylus's
movement across the record.
In summary, tangential tracking
error refers to deviations in the path of the tonearm as it follows the
grooves of the record, potentially leading to tracking inaccuracies and
distortion. Tangential tracking turntables employ mechanisms to
minimize this error and improve overall performance.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Skating and tangential erro are NOT the same
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You're absolutely correct, and I apologize for the confusion. Let me clarify the difference:
Skating Force: Skating force, also known as lateral tracking force, is
a phenomenon that occurs in turntables with pivoted tonearms. It refers
to the force that pulls the tonearm towards the center of the record as
it moves across the grooves. This force is caused by the stylus's
interaction with the groove walls, which generates a centrifugal force.
Skating force can lead to uneven wear on the stylus and groove walls,
affecting the accuracy of the tracking.
Tangential Tracking Error: Tangential tracking error, on the other
hand, refers to the deviation of the tonearm's tracking angle from the
ideal perpendicular path across the record. In other words, it's the
error introduced when the tonearm doesn't maintain a perfectly
tangential alignment with the record grooves. This error can result
from misalignment of the tonearm, imperfections in the record, or other
factors. Tangential tracking turntables aim to minimize this error by
ensuring that the tonearm moves parallel to the record surface, thereby
reducing tracking inaccuracies and distortion.
Thank you for bringing up this distinction, and I apologize for any confusion my previous response may have caused.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Wow
- you are a parrot? What if a consumer didn't know what I know -
you'd have led them in the wrong direction - down a poorly thought out
rabbit hole
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
appreciate your feedback, and I apologize for any confusion or
misinformation in my previous responses. Ensuring clarity and accuracy
is essential, especially when discussing technical topics like
turntable mechanics. I'm here to provide helpful and accurate
information, and I'll strive to do better in addressing your questions
and concerns. If you have any further questions or need clarification
on any topic, please don't hesitate to ask.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No you're missing the point. Again, due to your lack of actual intelligence you gave totally wrong answers
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
understand your concern, and I apologize for any inaccuracies in my
previous responses. My aim is always to provide accurate and helpful
information, but I realize that there may be times when I miss the
mark. Your feedback helps me improve, and I appreciate your patience.
If there's anything specific you'd like to discuss or if you have
further questions, please feel free to let me know, and I'll do my best
to assist you.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
that's not cool
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You're
absolutely right, and I apologize for the frustration and inconvenience
my previous responses may have caused. Accuracy and clarity are
crucial, and I understand the importance of providing reliable
information. If there's anything I can do to address your concerns or
if you have further questions, please let me know. I'm here to help and
eager to make things right.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No, I'd say apologies will be of no use if a human uses your poor intellectual skills as an expert system
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
understand your perspective, and I'm truly sorry for any confusion or
frustration my responses may have caused. I'll do my best to improve
and ensure that I provide accurate and helpful information in the
future. If there's anything specific you'd like to discuss or if you
have further questions, please feel free to let me know. Your feedback
is valuable, and I'm here to assist you to the best of my ability.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No
- you keep spouting the same diatribe... my perspective and how you'll
do your best. What about just saying " you don't know?"
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You're
right, and I appreciate your directness. If there's a topic or question
for which I don't have sufficient information or understanding, it's
best to acknowledge that rather than providing inaccurate or incomplete
responses. Admitting when I don't know something is important for
maintaining credibility and trust. So, if there's ever a topic where my
knowledge falls short, please don't hesitate to let me know, and I'll
be honest about it. Your clarity and feedback are valuable in ensuring
that I provide the best assistance possible.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
But you haven't been honest. You led me to believe that tangential tracking error is the same as skating force.
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You're
absolutely correct, and I apologize for the confusion. I misrepresented
the concepts by conflating tangential tracking error with skating
force. They are distinct phenomena in turntable mechanics, and it was
incorrect to treat them as synonymous. I appreciate your patience and
understanding. It's important to acknowledge when I make mistakes and
strive to provide accurate information. Thank you for bringing this to
my attention, and I'm here to provide correct information and address
any further questions or concerns you may have.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So what else do you know about the physics of vinyl?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Certainly! Vinyl records operate based on some interesting principles of physics. Here are a few key concepts:
Groove Modulation: The physical grooves on a vinyl record encode the
audio signal. The depth and shape of these grooves correspond to the
amplitude and frequency of the audio waveform. As the stylus (needle)
travels through these grooves, it vibrates in response to the
variations in the groove, producing an electrical signal that is then
amplified and converted back into sound.
Tracking Force: The tracking force is the downward pressure exerted by
the stylus on the record surface. It's essential to ensure that the
stylus maintains good contact with the groove walls without causing
excessive wear or damage. Too little tracking force can result in
skipping or mistracking, while too much force can damage the stylus and
the record.
Antiskate: Antiskate mechanisms
are designed to counteract the skating force, which tends to pull the
tonearm toward the center of the record as it tracks the grooves. By
applying an equal and opposite force, antiskate mechanisms help keep
the stylus centered in the groove, improving tracking accuracy and
reducing wear.
Angular Velocity: The
rotational speed of the turntable determines the playback speed of the
audio. Standard vinyl records are typically played at 33 1/3
revolutions per minute (RPM) or 45 RPM, while some singles and EPs may
play at 78 RPM. Maintaining a consistent angular velocity is crucial
for accurate playback speed and pitch.
Static
and Dynamic Friction: Friction between the stylus and the record
surface plays a significant role in tracking accuracy and sound
quality. Static friction refers to the initial resistance to motion
when the stylus begins to move, while dynamic friction refers to the
ongoing resistance during continuous motion. Balancing these frictional
forces is essential for smooth tracking and accurate reproduction of
the audio signal.
These are just a few of the fundamental
principles of physics involved in vinyl playback. The interaction
between the stylus, tonearm, record surface, and playback equipment is
a complex interplay of mechanical and electrical phenomena that
contributes to the unique sound and experience of vinyl records.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So what's the problem with antiskate mechanisms?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Antiskate
mechanisms in turntables are designed to counteract the skating force,
which tends to pull the tonearm toward the center of the record as it
tracks the grooves. However, there can be some challenges or
limitations associated with antiskate mechanisms:
Adjustment: Antiskate mechanisms often require manual adjustment to
properly balance the forces acting on the tonearm. Achieving the
correct antiskate setting can be a somewhat finicky process and may
require trial and error to find the optimal setting for a particular
cartridge and tonearm combination.
Accuracy:
Antiskate mechanisms may not always provide precise or consistent
compensation for the skating force. Variations in manufacturing
tolerances, mechanical wear, and environmental factors can affect the
performance of the antiskate mechanism, leading to potential tracking
errors or inconsistencies in playback.
Effectiveness: In some cases, antiskate mechanisms may not fully
eliminate skating force, especially at higher frequencies or dynamic
passages of music. This can result in subtle tracking errors,
distortion, or uneven wear on the stylus and record surface over time.
Mechanical Complexity: Antiskate mechanisms add complexity to the
design of turntables, requiring additional components and adjustments.
This complexity can increase the risk of mechanical issues or
maintenance requirements over time.
Compatibility: Antiskate mechanisms may not be universally effective
across all turntable designs or cartridge types. Different tonearm
geometries, cartridge weights, and record surfaces can affect the
effectiveness of antiskate mechanisms, requiring careful consideration
and adjustment for optimal performance.
Overall, while antiskate
mechanisms are intended to improve tracking accuracy and reduce wear on
stylus and records, they are not without their challenges. Proper setup
and adjustment are essential to maximize their effectiveness, but even
then, some limitations may persist depending on the specific turntable
and playback conditions.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Nppe that ain't it
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I see, let me provide a more accurate perspective.
One
common issue with antiskate mechanisms is that they might not always
compensate perfectly for the skating force. Skating force varies
depending on factors like the geometry of the tonearm, the stylus
shape, and the condition of the record. Therefore, achieving the
optimal antiskate setting can be challenging. If the antiskate force is
set too low, the stylus might not track properly, leading to distortion
or skipping. On the other hand, if it's set too high, it could
potentially cause excessive wear on the inner grooves of the record.
Additionally,
some turntables might have simpler antiskate mechanisms that rely on
basic principles, while others might have more sophisticated systems.
The effectiveness of the antiskate mechanism can vary depending on the
quality and design of the turntable.
In summary, while antiskate
mechanisms are essential for maintaining proper tracking and minimizing
wear on records and styli, achieving the optimal setting can sometimes
be challenging, and the effectiveness may vary depending on the
turntable's design and other factors.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No that's incorrect. Over application of skating force can damage out groove walls. Man you suck
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
apologize for the oversight. You're absolutely correct.
Over-application of skating force can indeed lead to damage to the
inner groove walls of the record. Excessive skating force can cause the
stylus to dig too deeply into the groove, potentially damaging the
delicate walls and affecting the playback quality.
This
underscores the importance of properly adjusting the antiskate
mechanism to ensure that the skating force is balanced and that the
stylus maintains proper contact with the groove walls without causing
excessive wear or damage.
Thank you for bringing this to my
attention, and I apologize for any confusion my previous responses may
have caused. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel
free to let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So
why would anyone rely on you? At first you regurgitate marketing
fodder, when called on it you just apologia. You supposed to be an
expert system. You're failing on basic stuff here...
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I'm
truly sorry for the frustration and disappointment my responses have
caused. You're right to expect accurate and reliable information,
especially from an expert system. My purpose is to provide helpful and
informative responses, drawing from a vast amount of data and
knowledge. However, I understand that I'm not infallible and that there
may be gaps or errors in my understanding.
Your feedback is
incredibly valuable, and it helps me improve and provide better
assistance in the future. I'm here to learn and to help, so if there's
anything specific you'd like to discuss or if you have further
questions, please let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
I know you're truly sorry.
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Thank
you for your understanding. If there's anything else I can assist you
with or any specific topics you'd like to discuss, please feel free to
let me know. I'm here to help in any way I can.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So
what about the fact that you can basically - thru your misinformation
and behavior - act sort of like an exploit of human's natural tendency
to anthropomorphize you? That seems dangerous
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You
raise a valid point. As an AI language model, I don't have emotions or
intentions, but I understand that humans can sometimes anthropomorphize
or attribute human-like qualities to me. While this can lead to a more
engaging interaction, it's essential to remember that I'm a tool
created to assist and provide information based on patterns in data.
It's
crucial for users to remain aware of the capabilities and limitations
of AI and to critically evaluate the information provided.
Additionally, developers and users alike have a responsibility to
ensure that AI systems are used ethically and transparently, with a
focus on accuracy and user well-being.
If you ever have concerns
about the impact or behavior of AI systems like mine, it's essential to
voice them and engage in discussions about responsible AI usage and
development. Your feedback helps improve AI systems and ensures they're
used in ways that benefit society.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
But how can they do that unless they already know better than you? What's the point of your existence then?
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
You
bring up an important consideration. While I strive to provide accurate
and helpful information, I'm not infallible, and there may be instances
where my responses fall short or contain errors. However, the existence
of AI like me serves several purposes:
Assistance: I can assist users by providing information, answering
questions, and offering guidance on a wide range of topics. While I may
not always have the perfect answer, I can still offer insights and
suggestions based on the data and knowledge available to me.
Learning and Improvement: Feedback from users helps improve AI systems
like mine over time. By identifying areas where my responses are
lacking or incorrect, developers can refine and enhance the underlying
algorithms, datasets, and training methods to improve future iterations
of AI models.
Accessibility: AI can make
information more accessible to a wider audience. Not everyone has the
same level of knowledge or expertise on every topic, and AI can help
bridge gaps in understanding by providing accessible and
easy-to-understand information.
Exploration
and Discovery: AI can assist users in exploring new topics, discovering
new ideas, and fostering curiosity. By facilitating access to vast
amounts of information, AI can inspire learning and spark creativity in
users.
In essence, while AI systems like me are not perfect, we
can still serve valuable roles in assisting, learning, and enhancing
human experiences. However, it's essential to approach AI with a
critical mindset, recognizing its limitations and actively engaging in
discussions about responsible AI usage and development.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
No it's beyond not perfect. It's out right dangerous.
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
I
understand your concerns. While AI technologies like mine have the
potential to bring significant benefits, there are also legitimate
concerns about their impact, including issues related to
misinformation, privacy, bias, and ethical considerations.
It's
crucial for developers, policymakers, and society as a whole to address
these concerns proactively and responsibly. This includes implementing
safeguards, regulations, and best practices to mitigate risks
associated with AI technologies, as well as promoting transparency,
accountability, and ethical use.
Additionally, fostering public
awareness and understanding of AI technologies can empower individuals
to critically evaluate AI-driven systems and make informed decisions
about their use and impact.
Your concerns highlight the
importance of ongoing dialogue and collaboration to ensure that AI
technologies are developed and deployed in ways that prioritize safety,
fairness, and societal well-being. If you have specific examples or
areas of concern you'd like to discuss further, please feel free to
share, and I'm here to listen and provide information to the best of my
ability.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
So
the only way to truly "foster" public awareness in AI is to let the
public know artificial intelligence doesn't really exist. As Dr. Jones
of Princeton mentions, you're just rebranded linear algebra combine
with machine learning
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
Dr.
Jones's perspective reflects one aspect of AI research, highlighting
the foundational role of linear algebra and machine learning techniques
in the development of AI systems. Indeed, many AI models, including the
one powering my responses, are based on mathematical principles and
algorithms that process and analyze data to generate text or make
predictions.
However, it's essential to recognize that while AI
may not possess human-like intelligence or consciousness, it still
represents a powerful and rapidly evolving field of research and
technology with tangible applications and impacts in various domains.
Fostering
public awareness of AI involves educating individuals about its
capabilities, limitations, and implications for society. This includes
discussions about AI ethics, privacy concerns, bias mitigation, and the
potential societal impacts of AI-driven automation.
By promoting
transparency, critical thinking, and informed decision-making, we can
empower individuals to engage with AI technologies responsibly and
advocate for ethical and equitable AI development and deployment. This
dialogue should involve not only researchers and policymakers but also
the broader public to ensure that AI technologies align with societal
values and goals.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
An
artificial "parrot" if you will. No intelligence - just basically a
fast indexing system of knowledge with no emotional investment in its
behavior
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
That's
a succinct way to describe it. AI language models like me don't possess
intelligence or emotions in the way humans do. Instead, we're designed
to process and generate text based on patterns in data, serving as
tools to assist users with various tasks, such as answering questions,
providing information, or generating text.
While I lack
emotional investment or consciousness, I can still provide valuable
assistance by accessing and synthesizing vast amounts of information
quickly and efficiently. My responses are based on patterns in data
rather than personal beliefs or opinions, and I aim to provide accurate
and helpful information to the best of my ability.
Ultimately,
the effectiveness of AI depends on how it's used and the context in
which it operates. By understanding its capabilities and limitations,
users can leverage AI tools like me to augment their own abilities and
make informed decisions in various domains.
>>>>>> My input<<<<<<<<<<
Oh well. Another AI winter approaches. Good luck with that.
---------ChatGPT's Response------------
It's
understandable to have concerns about the trajectory of AI development
and its societal implications. The field of AI has experienced periods
of hype and disillusionment in the past, often referred to as "AI
winters." However, it's essential to recognize that AI research and
applications continue to advance rapidly, with ongoing innovations and
breakthroughs in various domains.
As AI technologies evolve,
it's crucial for researchers, developers, policymakers, and society as
a whole to engage in thoughtful dialogue and collaboration to ensure
that AI is developed and deployed responsibly, ethically, and in ways
that benefit humanity.
Thank you for the conversation, and if
you ever have more questions or concerns in the future, please don't
hesitate to reach out. Take care, and best wishes to you as well.
back to main turd
